Microfibril-Associated Protein 5 Regulates Skin Fibroblast Function And Scar Formation
Chen Han1, Trevor R. Leonardo1, Bruna Romana-Souza2, Junhe Shi3, Mohamad Altakriti1, Matthew J. Ranzer4, Sammy Ferri-Borgogno5, Samuel C. Mok5, Lin Chen1, Luisa A. DiPietro1
1Center for Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2Department of Histology and Embryology, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 3Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China 4Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 5Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA
Background: Recent studies by our lab show that fibroblasts can act as non-professional phagocytes and engulf apoptotic cells in healing skin wounds. Following apoptotic cell engulfment, fibroblasts develop a fibrotic phenotype with enhanced migration and increased α-SMA expression, along with increased TGFβ1 and collagen production. RNA sequencing of these phagocytic fibrotic fibroblasts showed that microfibril-associated protein 5 (MFAP5, or microfibril-associated glycoprotein 2/MAGP2) is significantly upregulated. MFAP5, a 25 kD extracellular matrix ECM glycoprotein, is linked to fibrosis and angiogenesis in certain cancers and is increased in fibrotic diseases. However, it’s role in wound healing and scar formation is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate MFAP5’s role in wound healing in vivo and its effect on fibroblast phenotype in vitro.
Materials & Methods: Microarray, real-time PCR analysis, and immunofluorescence staining of MFAP5 in full-thickness excisional mouse skin wounds was performed. MFAP5 neutralization was performed in vivo by treating full-thickness excisional mouse skin wounds with anti-MFAP5 antibodies. Angiogenesis in treated wounds was quantified using immunofluorescent staining of CD31, while collagen deposition was evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining. Wound closure was also measured. In vitro gain of function experiments was done by culturing fibroblasts with recombinant MFAP5. Cellular migration, contractile activity and genomics were then assessed.
Results: Mfap5 expression was significantly upregulated during the later proliferative and remodelling phases of healing in vivo. Immunohistochemical localization showed that MFAP5 was predominantly in the cytoplasm of dermal cells and in scars of dermal ECM in vivo. Treatment of mouse wounds with anti-MFAP5 antibodies had no effect on wound closure. However, compared to control, antibody treated wounds had significantly decreased angiogenesis at 7 days post-wounding and decreased collagen deposition at 21 days post-wounding. In vitro, treatment with recombinant MFAP5 significantly enhanced fibroblast migration and contractility. Recombinant MFAP5 also significantly induced fibroblast expression of ACTA2, COL1A1, COL6A3, COL11A1, MMP1, MMP9 and TGFβ1 in vitro.
Conclusions: Together, our results support a novel role for MFAP5 in the regulation of fibroblasts, scar formation, and ECM reconstruction during skin wound healing.